🔗 Share this article

Avril Coleridge-Taylor always bore the weight of her family reputation. As the offspring of Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, a leading the prominent English composers of the 1900s, the composer’s reputation was shrouded in the long shadows of the past.

An Inaugural Recording

In recent months, I contemplated these shadows as I prepared to produce the first-ever recording of Avril’s piano concerto from 1936. Boasting intense musical themes, expressive melodies, and bold rhythms, her composition will grant audiences valuable perspective into how this artist – an artist in conflict born in 1903 – imagined her reality as a female composer of color.

Shadows and Truth

However about legacies. It can take a while to acclimate, to perceive forms as they actually appear, to distinguish truth from misrepresentation, and I felt hesitant to confront Avril’s past for a while.

I had so wanted the composer to be following in her father’s footsteps. Partially, that held. The pastoral English palettes of parental inspiration can be detected in numerous compositions, such as From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). But you only have to look at the names of her father’s compositions to understand how he viewed himself as not only a champion of British Romantic style but a voice of the African diaspora.

At this point parent and child seemed to diverge.

White America judged Samuel by the mastery of his music instead of the his ethnicity.

Parental Heritage

During his studies at the prestigious music college, the composer – the child of a parent from Sierra Leone and a British mother – turned toward his background. When the African American poet this literary figure came to London in 1897, the aspiring artist actively pursued him. He composed this literary work into music and the subsequent year adapted his verses for a stage piece, Dream Lovers. Then came the choral work that put Samuel on the map: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Based on Henry Wadsworth Longfellow’s The Song of Hiawatha, this composition was an international hit, notably for the Black community who felt indirect honor as American society evaluated the composer by the brilliance of his art as opposed to the colour of his skin.

Activism and Politics

Recognition did not temper Samuel’s politics. During that period, he attended the First Pan African Conference in London where he encountered the African American intellectual WEB Du Bois and observed a variety of discussions, such as the subjugation of Black South Africans. He remained an advocate to his final days. He sustained relationships with trailblazers for equality including this intellectual and Booker T Washington, gave addresses on equality for all, and even talked about racial problems with the US President during an invitation to the White House in that year. As for his music, the scholar reflected, “he made his mark so prominently as a creative artist that it cannot soon be forgotten.” He succumbed in that year, in his thirties. But what would Samuel have thought of his offspring’s move to work in this country in the that decade?

Conflict and Policy

“Child of Celebrated Artist expresses approval to apartheid system,” ran a headline in the African American magazine Jet magazine. The system “appeared to me the right policy”, she informed Jet. When pushed to clarify, she revised her statement: she didn’t agree with the system “as a concept” and it “ought to be permitted to work itself out, directed by well-meaning people of all races”. Were the composer more in tune to her father’s politics, or from Jim Crow America, she could have hesitated about the policy. Yet her life had protected her.

Identity and Naivety

“I possess a British passport,” she remarked, “and the government agents did not inquire me about my race.” Therefore, with her “fair” complexion (according to the magazine), she floated among the Europeans, lifted by their admiration for her late father. She gave a talk about her parent’s compositions at the University of Cape Town and led the broadcasting ensemble in Johannesburg, programming the inspiring part of her concerto, titled: “Dedicated to my Father.” Although a accomplished player herself, she never played as the soloist in her concerto. On the contrary, she always led as the conductor; and so the apartheid orchestra followed her lead.

The composer aspired, as she stated, she “could introduce a shift”. However, by that year, circumstances deteriorated. After authorities became aware of her mixed background, she had to depart the country. Her citizenship failed to safeguard her, the diplomatic official recommended her departure or face arrest. She went back to the UK, feeling great shame as the scale of her innocence was realized. “This experience was a hard one,” she stated. Increasing her disgrace was the 1955 publication of her controversial discussion, a year after her unceremonious exit from that nation.

A Recurring Theme

As I sat with these shadows, I felt a familiar story. The account of identifying as British until it’s challenged – which recalls Black soldiers who fought on behalf of the English throughout the World War II and made it through but were denied their due compensation. And the Windrush generation,